Stage 2 (Keeneland Prize) as of week 31 of the annual event. Through Saturday, Sept. 27, 2019.
The 2nd Consistency Leaderboard contest of 2019 was a real nail-biter. William D. led until the top of the stretch but then was collared by mulitple entrants. Going into the final week, William D., Frank M. and Kyle F. were tied for the lead with 18 points, but several other players were right behind them and also in position to win if they put up a big day on the final Saturday. Some of the best tournament players in the country were vying for the $3,000 Keeneland prize, but it would end up being Kyle F. who put up a monster score, earning 2 points, and winning this contest (within a contest) by 0.50 points. Congrats to Kyle F. on an outstanding job, and thank you to everyone who participated.
| Keeneland Consistency Leaderboard | ||
| as of the conclusion Sept. 27, 2019 | ||
| Customer | C.Points | |
| Kyle F | 20 | |
| Stephen W., Jr | 19.5 | |
| Frank M | 19 | |
| William D | 19 | |
| Ellis S | 18 | |
| Gregory L | 18 | |
| Blake C | 17.5 | |
| Kevin W | 17.5 | |
| Craig S | 17 | |
| Rick V | 17 | |
| Bernard H | 16.5 | |
| Donald N | 16.5 | |
| Glen S | 16.5 | |
| Jeffrey F | 16.5 | |
| Matthew B | 16.5 | |
| Adrian E | 15 | |
| Mike E | 14.5 | |
| Gerald P., Sr. | 13.5 | |
| James C | 13 | |
| John S | 13 | |
| Michael W | 12.5 | |
| Christopher L | 11 | |
| Bill M | 10 | |
| Lawrence K | 10 | |
| Dennis T | 9.5 | |
| Gerald P., Jr. | 9 | |
| Mitchell F | 9 | |
| Gerald C | 8.5 | |
| Daven T | 8 | |
| Brian N | 7 | |
| Joseph G | 7 | |
| Rich M | 5.5 | |
| Ron G | 5.5 | |
| John F | 5 | |
| Michael B | 5 | |
| Michael F | 5 | |
| Shaun B | 4.5 | |
| Francis C | 4 | |
| Greg B | 4 | |
| John G | 4 | |
| Scott C. | 4 | |
| Darryl L | 3.5 | |
| Steven F | 3.5 | |
| Justin G | 3 | |
| Shawn T | 3 | |
| Steven M | 2.5 | |
| Ed M | 2 | |
| Phillip C | 1.5 | |
| Paul S | 1 | |
| Robert F | 1 | |
| Sammy R | 1 | |
Year-to-Date Leaderboard as of Oct. 12, 2019. Only 2 weeks remain to improve your annual score. The top players who have not already qualified into the Nov. Finals will win their way in via the Annual Consistency Points LB.
| Annual CP Leaderboard as of 10/12/2019 | |
| Customer | C.Points |
| Ellis S | 40 |
| Gregory L | 36.5 |
| Kevin W | 36 |
| Stephen W | 35.5 |
| Rick V | 34.5 |
| Bernard H | 33.5 |
| Glen S | 33 |
| Dennis T | 32.5 |
| Matthew B | 32.5 |
| Adrian E | 32 |
| Frank M | 32 |
| Gerald P., Sr. | 32 |
| John S | 31 |
| Mike E | 31 |
| Craig S | 30.5 |
| Donald N | 29 |
| William D | 28 |
| Jeffrey F | 27.5 |
| Michael W | 27 |
| Kyle F | 26.5 |
| Gerald C | 25.5 |
| Lawrence K | 25 |
| Brian N | 23.5 |
| Gerald P., Jr. | 23 |
| Christopher L | 22 |
| Mitchell F | 22 |
| Scott C. | 21.5 |
| Shawn T | 20 |
| Ron G | 18.5 |
| Sammy R | 18.5 |
| Blake C | 17.5 |
| Rich M | 17.5 |
| John F | 14.5 |
| John G | 14 |
| Shaun B | 14 |
| Justin G | 13 |
| James C | 12 |
| Steven F | 12 |
| Joseph G | 9.5 |
| Robert S | 9.5 |
Consistency Points contest awarded a spot into the two Saratoga tournaments
| Stage 1 Consistency Points | ||
| Final Leaderboard - 2019 | ||
| Name | C.Points | |
| Dennis T | 23 | |
| Ellis S | 19 | |
| Gregory L | 18 | |
| Glen S | 17.5 | |
| Matthew B | 17.5 | |
| Rick V | 17.5 | |
| Sammy R | 17.5 | |
| Scott C. | 17.5 | |
| Gerald C | 17 | |
| Kevin W | 17 | |
| Shawn T | 17 | |
| Stephen W | 17 | |
| Gerald P, Sr. | 16.5 | |
| Adrian E | 16 | |
| Bernard H | 16 | |
| John S | 16 | |
| Lawrence K | 16 | |
| Brian N | 15.5 | |
| Mike E | 15 | |
| Frank M | 14 | |
| Michael W | 13.5 | |
| Craig S | 13 | |
| Gerald P, Jr. | 13 | |
| Mitchell F | 13 | |
| Christopher L | 12 | |
| Donald N | 12 | |
| Ron G | 12 | |
| John G | 11 | |
| Rich M | 11 | |
| Jeffrey F | 10.5 | |
| Justin G | 10 | |
| Shaun B | 10 | |
| John F | 9.5 | |
| Robert S | 9.5 | |
| William D | 9 | |
| Bill M | 8 | |
| Kyle F | 8 | |
| Steven F | 7.5 | |
| Kevin M | 6 | |
| Michael M | 6 | |
| Steve W. Sr. | 6 | |
| Joel P | 5.5 | |
| Robert F | 5.5 | |
| Greg B | 3 | |
| Joseph S | 3 | |
| Patrick G | 3 | |
| Gerard R | 2 | |
| Joseph G | 2 | |
| Lester I | 2 | |
| Darryl L | 1 | |
| David N | 1 | |
| Ed M | 1 | |
| Francis C | 1 | |
| Larry H | 1 | |
| Larry H | 1 | |
| Ron K. | 1 | |
| Steve W | 1 | |
You can now follow BetPTC.com on the world's leading social networking sites and get immediate updates on the latest PTC news and promotions*! Follow us daily on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. You can join us by clicking on the logos on our homepage, or by heading to the following links:
FACEBOOK | TWITTER | LINKED IN | PINTEREST
a Primer from Sky Racing World
The following is a quick guide to help you to better understand the main differences between Australian racing and the rest of the world.
Post Positions/Weights
If you bet on horse number 1 don’t go looking for it to start from the inside gate. There is just as much chance that it could be drawn in post 16. In Australian races, the field is assembled in order of weight. The horse carrying saddlecloth number 1 always will have been assigned top weight or equal top weight. If there are 24 horses in a race, the horse carrying saddlecloth number 24 always will have been assigned the minimum or co-minimum (set-weight races notwithstanding). Once the horses are assembled in order of weight, the draw for post position takes place.
Handicapping
This will prove the biggest initial challenge to players here, primarily because of the differences in the way races are written. Because there are very few claiming races in Australia, many races are designated for horses which have won the same number of races. Most horses start out in maiden races. When they win, most will then come back in a Class 1 handicap, which means non-winners of two races lifetime .
The best pointer to use when handicapping an Australian race – given that many races in the past performance lines will read Hcp (Handicap) or Mdn (Maiden) – is to note the value (purse) of the race or the track class. All Australian tracks simulcasted are designated a “track class” of either (in order of quality) Metropolitan, Provincial, or Country. These designations can be found in the official past performances lines next to the track name as (m),(p), or (c).
Wager on Aussie horse racing with BetPTC.com
Watching a Race
The style of Australian racing is more European than American. First, all races are on the turf. Racing is conducted both clockwise and counter-clockwise depending on the region of the country. A good trip plays an even greater part in the outcome of a race in Australia than it does here. There are several reasons for this – primarily, the larger fields, slower initial pace and tighter racing. When handicapping, pay attention to starting points and layouts of each track. The length of the stretch and tightness of the turns can differ greatly between tracks and have a definite impact on race tactics and outcome. The player looking to identify a track bias will have to do it on a day-to-day basis. Unlike tracks in other parts of the world, it is very rare for a racetrack to race on consecutive days.
The Simulcast
Because of the larger average fields, there are now 24 betting interests available. Rarely will you see a field of 24 go to the post, the Emirates Melbourne Cup (GI) is an example of a race that allows for 24 runners. A few times a week, there will be races that allow for 20+ runners, one can usually find these on Tuesday/Friday nights where we feature racing from the top level metropolitan tracks in and around the major cities.
When watching the races, saddlecloth numbers can sometimes be difficult to see. It is best to identify your horse of interest by the color of the jockey’s silks. These colors are available in the program right above the past performance lines. As a bettor you will also find that races from Australia can take quite a bit longer to go official. Due to international simulcast regulations a more comprehensive review and verification process of the results is required before official payouts are made.
